Return on investment is usually associated with 3-5 year policy and funding cycles. How does one make the case for longer term investments (in say CRVS or, in this case, stronger health systems)? How does one make the case that long-term investing in public health will save money that in future will be ploughed (profitably?) into chasing diseases?
Return on investment is usually associated with 3-5 year policy and funding cycles. How does one make the case for longer term investments (in say CRVS or, in this case, stronger health systems)? How does one make the case that long-term investing in public health will save money that in future will be ploughed (profitably?) into chasing diseases?